NIST Cautions on AI Data Poisoning and Manipulation Generative AI ML Machine Learning
An AI system can malfunction if an adversary finds a way to confuse its decision making. In this example, errant markings on the road mislead a driverless car, potentially making it veer into oncoming traffic. This “evasion” attack is one of numerous adversarial tactics described in a new NIST publication intended to help outline the types of attacks we might expect along with approaches to mitigate them.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has posted a new publication on emerging threats of artificial intelligence and machine learning. The publication, “Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations”, covers a comprehensive amount of potential AI/ML threats and vulnerabilities, including data poisoning, malicious manipulation, and other forms of abuse. It includes discussing generative AI and large language model vulnerabilities.

The paper was co-authored by computer scientists from NIST, industry, and academia and spans over 100 pages.

At the heart of the vulnerability lies the “black box” nature of AI. Unlike traditional software, where we can scrutinize each line of code, AI models often learn through vast datasets, making their decision-making processes opaque. This lack of transparency creates openings for attackers to exploit, injecting biases or manipulating input data to bend the AI’s will.

AI Attack Vectors: Evasion, Poisoning, Privacy and Abuse

The report meticulously dissects four major attack categories:

1. Evasion: The attacker creates “adversarial examples” – seemingly innocuous inputs that trigger unexpected and often harmful outputs. Imagine a self-driving car mistaking a stop sign for a speed limit due to a cleverly crafted sticker.

2. Poisoning: Attackers contaminate the training data used to “teach” the AI model, skewing its future decisions. Think of feeding a language model biased news articles, warping its understanding of reality.

3. Privacy Attacks: These exploit vulnerabilities in data-hungry AI systems to steal sensitive information. A facial recognition system, for instance, could be fooled into revealing identities it shouldn’t.

4. Abuse Attacks: Attackers take advantage of the AI’s intended functionality for malicious purposes. A spam filter trained to recognize phishing emails could be tricked into letting them through, unleashing a wave of malware.

Introduction to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0): An Explainer Video. (Source: NIST)

For each attack type, the report delves into its various flavors, attacker objectives, and required capabilities. This meticulous taxonomy equips developers with a battle map, highlighting potential weak points in their AI armor.

But NIST doesn’t just identify the threats; it provides shields too. The report outlines mitigation strategies, suggesting diverse training regimens, data validation techniques, and anomaly detection systems. While no silver bullet exists, these proactive measures can significantly raise the bar for attackers.

However, the report also delivers a sobering dose of reality. There’s no foolproof defense against a determined and resourceful adversary. The sheer volume of data involved in training modern AI models makes comprehensive monitoring and filtering a Sisyphean task. This means embracing vigilance and continuous improvement – patching vulnerabilities, updating models, and constantly testing for adversarial inputs.

NIST’s report is a critical first step in securing the AI frontier. By exposing the arsenal of cyberattacks and offering practical defenses, it empowers developers and users to build more robust and trustworthy AI systems. As AI integration deepens into every facet of our lives, ensuring its resilience against manipulation becomes paramount. We must remember, that with great intelligence comes great responsibility, and that includes safeguarding it from the dark side of technology.

The full report can be accessed on NIST’s documentation portal.

You May Also Like

NSA: Russian hackers targeting US, European supply chain for Ukraine

The National Security Agency (NSA) has said that Russian hackers are using…

CISA announces “Malware Next-Gen” for malware analysis

CISA has announced Malware Next-Gen is now accepting public submissions of malware and suspicious files to be reviewed by cyber experts.

Meta, Apple, Amazon, Twitter and Google are all laying off. What happened?

Only two years ago, big tech and Silicon Valley were on what…